<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sharing Data on the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/2010/02/sharing-data-on-the-web.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/2010/02/sharing-data-on-the-web.php</link>
	<description>From Semantic Web to Web of Data</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 13:28:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A linguist&#8217;s perpective Creative Commons&#8217; data sharing whitepaper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/2010/02/sharing-data-on-the-web.php/comment-page-1#comment-10631</link>
		<dc:creator>A linguist&#8217;s perpective Creative Commons&#8217; data sharing whitepaper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 22:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/?p=3512#comment-10631</guid>
		<description>[...] this post on (legal aspects of) data sharing by Creative Commons&#8217; Kaitlin Thaney is also highly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this post on (legal aspects of) data sharing by Creative Commons&#8217; Kaitlin Thaney is also highly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#171;&#160;Sharing Data on the Web&#160;&#187; : http://blo&#8230; &#171; Infodoc Microblogging Service</title>
		<link>http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/2010/02/sharing-data-on-the-web.php/comment-page-1#comment-10385</link>
		<dc:creator>&#171;&#160;Sharing Data on the Web&#160;&#187; : http://blo&#8230; &#171; Infodoc Microblogging Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/?p=3512#comment-10385</guid>
		<description>[...] Data on the Web&#160;&#187; : http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/2010/02/sharing-data-on-the-web.php  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Data on the Web&nbsp;&raquo; : <a href="http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/2010/02/sharing-data-on-the-web.php" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/2010/02/sharing-data-on-the-web.php</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaitlin Thaney</title>
		<link>http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/2010/02/sharing-data-on-the-web.php/comment-page-1#comment-10364</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaitlin Thaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/?p=3512#comment-10364</guid>
		<description>Jiri -- not sure if this helps, but re: your point about RDF vocabulary for the license (or in the case of CC0 - a waiver, since it&#039;s not a license), the benefit of using CC0 to waive the rights is the fact it comes in 3 formats, just like the other legal tools at CC - the legal text, human-readable deed, and the machine readable code (more here: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CC0_FAQ)

Just for additional info, as well, since it may be of interest, our counsel has a great resource up on considerations to keep in mind when thinking of licensing an ontology, since as you can imagine - it&#039;s not as easy as one thinks to discern facts from creative expression at that level: http://sciencecommons.org/resources/readingroom/ontology-copyright-licensing-considerations

Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jiri &#8212; not sure if this helps, but re: your point about RDF vocabulary for the license (or in the case of CC0 &#8211; a waiver, since it&#8217;s not a license), the benefit of using CC0 to waive the rights is the fact it comes in 3 formats, just like the other legal tools at CC &#8211; the legal text, human-readable deed, and the machine readable code (more here: <a href="http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CC0_FAQ" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CC0_FAQ</a>)</p>
<p>Just for additional info, as well, since it may be of interest, our counsel has a great resource up on considerations to keep in mind when thinking of licensing an ontology, since as you can imagine &#8211; it&#8217;s not as easy as one thinks to discern facts from creative expression at that level: <a href="http://sciencecommons.org/resources/readingroom/ontology-copyright-licensing-considerations" rel="nofollow">http://sciencecommons.org/resources/readingroom/ontology-copyright-licensing-considerations</a></p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jiri Prochazka</title>
		<link>http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/2010/02/sharing-data-on-the-web.php/comment-page-1#comment-10358</link>
		<dc:creator>Jiri Prochazka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/?p=3512#comment-10358</guid>
		<description>I wonder if there is any RDF vocabulary worked on for expressing licensing information of RDF graphs and describing the licenses themselves with a RDF class for licenses...
For starters CC0 and PDDL could be defined as first examples. 
Of course it would be quite tricky to decide where to draw the line and what define in machine readable format and what not, defining an ontology as complete legal language for machines for describing laws in RDF (OWL) would be a quite overshot obviously at this stage of development (though undeniably useful and interesting).
Just making a RDF class for licenses would be good for me (though programmers would have to hard wire which licenses are acceptable in their apps).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if there is any RDF vocabulary worked on for expressing licensing information of RDF graphs and describing the licenses themselves with a RDF class for licenses&#8230;<br />
For starters CC0 and PDDL could be defined as first examples.<br />
Of course it would be quite tricky to decide where to draw the line and what define in machine readable format and what not, defining an ontology as complete legal language for machines for describing laws in RDF (OWL) would be a quite overshot obviously at this stage of development (though undeniably useful and interesting).<br />
Just making a RDF class for licenses would be good for me (though programmers would have to hard wire which licenses are acceptable in their apps).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Data Sharing on the Web</title>
		<link>http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/2010/02/sharing-data-on-the-web.php/comment-page-1#comment-10337</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Data Sharing on the Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 03:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/?p=3512#comment-10337</guid>
		<description>[...] Wish you could have been there? Me too.  Luckily for us, all four of the tutorial leaders are composing their thoughts on data sharing for articles in Nodalities.  Kaitlin produced a great piece for this month’s issue called Data Sharing on the Web .  Be sure to check it out! The hardcopy version of the February Nodalities is not out yet, but you can read it online here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wish you could have been there? Me too.  Luckily for us, all four of the tutorial leaders are composing their thoughts on data sharing for articles in Nodalities.  Kaitlin produced a great piece for this month’s issue called Data Sharing on the Web .  Be sure to check it out! The hardcopy version of the February Nodalities is not out yet, but you can read it online here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

