Introducing the Semantic Web Gang
Today we’re launching a further series of podcasts to add to the range currently available to you. This new Semantic Web Gang will be a regular monthly show, tapping into insights on the news of the moment from some of those at the forefront in bringing the Semantic Web vision to reality.
Gang members for the first show were;
- Greg Boutin
- Mills Davis of Project 10X
- Tom Heath of Talis
- Alex Iskold of AdaptiveBlue
- Daniel Lewis of OpenLink
- Thomas Tague of Reuters
We shall be adding to the Gang in the coming months, as well as introducing the occasional special guest from time to time.
See this post on ZDNet’s blog, The Semantic Web, for more discussion.
During the conversation, we refer to the following resources;
- AdaptiveBlue
- Sir Tim Berners-Lee Talks about the Semantic Web podcast
- Calais
- Clearforest
- Knowledge Media Institute, Open University
- Netflix competition
- OpenLink
- OWL
- Project 10X
- RDF
- ReadWriteWeb
- Reuters
- Revyu.com
- Semantic Exchange
- Semantic Hacker contest
- Semantic Interoperability Community of Practice
- Semantic Technology Conference
- Talis
- Twine
- W3C
- Yahoo embraces the Semantic Web?
This conversation was conducted on 20 March 2008.
For further Talking with Talis podcasts on the emerging Web of Data, see here.
Technorati Tags: podcast, Podcasting, Semantic Web Gang, Semantic Web, Talis














March 25th, 2008 at 9:57 pm
Paul
You should consider a del.icio.us tag or username for people to recommend topic ideas for the gang.
This is great stuff. Looking forward more “gangs”
March 25th, 2008 at 10:17 pm
Deepak - Surely we’d do it in Twine? !
There’s already a gang member twine there. Maybe I should also set up a suggestions twine. And yes, while it’s still in beta we’ll need something like Del.icio.us too…
Glad you’re listening!
Paul
March 26th, 2008 at 12:07 am
Twine was my first instinct. Then I realized that it’s still not quite public yet :).
Great show. Especially for the first one. You guys should fight more though :).
I am glad the “value of data” question came up. It will be interesting to see if this question is explored more in the future.
March 26th, 2008 at 4:02 pm
Request for fight noted!

March 27th, 2008 at 5:44 pm
After Alex’ article it should get more interesting. Lots of things to argue about