« Scoble, Facebook, Plaxo, open data; time for change? | Main | Data Licenses for Social Network Services »

4 January 2008

Privacy in the Cloud

Posted by Paul Miller at January 4, 2008 01:54 PM

The editorial comment section of today's Financial Times chooses to highlight the growing importance of Cloud computing. That is interesting, important, and deserving of comment in and of itself.

But, given yesterday's shenanigans, I was actually more interested in the sub-heading that the copy editor chose to insert above the piece in the print newspaper itself (page 8 of the UK edition, for those of you with one to hand);

“Centralised processing will come - but privacy is a concern
(my emphasis)

And, in the body of the piece itself;

“If giant 'clouds' do come to assume a more central role, then new controls and safeguards will be needed. As with electricity grids, the security and reliability of the new networks will become paramount. Tougher safeguards to protect privacy will be essential. Individuals should have clear ownership and control of their personal data, so that they can move and use them however they like.”
(my emphasis)

'See?!' leaps to mind...

Now to sneak back downstairs before the other residents of this house spot that I'm blogging rather than holidaying... ;-)

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs.talis.com/mt/mt-tb.r280.cgi/1149

Comments

Yeah, I think this is extremely important, also for the public perception of the Semantic Web. When I tell people what I do, it's the first concern that springs out, they are worried about the privacy implications. And the demise of plink.org back in the day proves that it can easily be a make or break for any application. The Semantic Web is so powerful, it can scare people too...

I always continue to talk about Policy Aware Web when people bring up that subject, saying "privacy is, contrary to other alternatives, built-in". But the fact is, we're not really using it to any great extent, are we?

Posted by: Kjetil Kjernsmo at January 4, 2008 03:01 PM

How do you respond to Steve Gillmor's point that it is your data, you just didn't record the fact that you gave a copy of it to Facebook, or whoever, when you did so? That seems a valid point to me. It even suggests that there may be a way to prevent social networking sites such as Facebook from making life difficult by creating a browser (plugin) that records the information that you give out in a way that can relatively easily be queried. Some sort of RDF database springs to mind... If I have missed the point, then I'd certainly appreciate the correction to my understanding.

Posted by: Chris at January 4, 2008 06:07 PM

Well, yes, I agree with you, Paul, the ownership of data is current a mess on the Web. I believed that one distinction between Web 2.0 and Web 1.0 was the exposition of ownership of web resources on Web 2.0; but it seems that this ownership issue is still a problem unsolved.

Companies such as Facebook think that they own users' data and exposed social connections since they (such as Facebook) have provided "free" service for the users. So the companies want to make money out of these user-generated resources while at the same time prohibiting other people or organizations taking benefits from them. Although this thought is understandable, it indeed hurts the normal data flow on the Web. This policy set up invisible barriers between web sites and greatly decreases the usability of web data.

More severely, this problem might be inherited by the future Web such as the Semantic Web. If we just feel inconvenient about this problem on Web 2.0, the problem would become intolerable when the Web evolves to be Semantic Web. This is a central issue when we start to think of the fundamentals of Semantic Web.

Yihong

Posted by: Yihong Ding at January 4, 2008 08:33 PM

Chris

that is a valid point - is this in a recent Gillmor Gang?

The issue then becomes one of working out how you make use of data from your contacts/friends in the way, for example, that Scoble tried to do. My contact details are mine, and I give a copy to Facebook. Your contact details are yours, and you give a copy to Facebook. That relationship says nothing about what I can do with your contact details, assuming you and I are friends on Facebook. I might (as Scoble did) want to add them to my address book, or transport them to an application other than Facebook. Do I need your permission for that, or Facebook's, or no one's?

This is one of the issues touched upon in my previous post - http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/2008/01/scoble_facebook_plaxo_open_dat.php

Posted by: Paul Miller at January 5, 2008 09:29 AM

Yihong and Kjetil - absolutely. Hence my concern/interest... This is one that we need to crack.

Posted by: Paul Miller at January 5, 2008 09:31 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)